Antichrist from the Middle East? By Chuck Missler
Koinonia House: In our previous article, we explored the possibility that while we understand that the coming world leader, whom we commonly call “the Antichrist,” is predicted to come from the Roman Empire,1 we tend to be myopic regarding the extent of this designation: we tend to equate the Roman Empire with Western Europe, ignoring the eastern leg of this empire, which outlasted the western leg by a thousand years!
If we carefully examine the many references in the Old Testament, we discover a surprising number of allusions to this dominant personage as “the Assyrian.”2 This would seem to focus on the region that we know today as Syria and Iraq. With the current world tensions over that very region, it seems quite timely to re-examine some of our perspectives regarding the potential role of that region in the climactic Biblical scenario!
Satan’s Seven Empires
The Bible profiles man’s history in terms of seven major empires:
And there appeared another wonder in heaven; and behold a great red dragon, having seven heads and ten horns, and seven crowns upon his heads. -Revelation 12:3
These would appear to be Egypt, Assyria, Babylon, Persian, Greece, and Rome, this last one in two phases: Ancient Rome (”Phase I”) and the final re-emergent revival of the Roman Empire (”Phase II”).
This perspective derives from a careful study of Daniel 2 and 7, which profiles the “times of the Gentiles” from Babylon until God establishes His own Kingdom, with the Messiah reigning as King of Kings. In both Daniel 2 and 7, we see four major kingdoms:
Babylon, Persia, Greece, and Rome-with the fourth one fragmenting, but then ultimately re-emerging in the “last days.”
Strangely, the prophecies of Daniel provide a surprising amount of detail concerning both Greece and Rome, with both Chapters 7 and 8 highlighting a “little horn” that emerges among the prominent “10 horns” that will dominate the final scenario.3
This “little horn” - an 11th, in effect - is another designation for the climactic world leader we commonly call “the Antichrist.”
When Alexander the Great died, four of his generals divided up the Greek Empire, with Ptolemy in the south and Seleucus in the east taking the largest shares. In fact, the contentions detailed in Daniel 11 chronicle - in advance - the rivalries between the Ptolemies and the Seleucids over the subsequent centuries with such an accuracy that skeptical critics have attempted to “late date” these passages to avoid acknowledging the supernatural aspect of these prophecies.4 [The fact that the Old Testament was translated into Greek (the Septuagint Version) during the early part of this period refutes these attempts.]
It is noteworthy that in both Daniel 8 and 11, prophecies highlighting the final world leader emerge from the passages involving the sequence of the leaders of the Seleucid Empire: the region now known as Syria and Iraq. 5 The seven empires are also the focus of Revelation 17:
And there are seven kings: five are fallen, and one is, and the other is not yet come; and when he cometh, he must continue a short space. - Revelation 17:10
The “five are fallen” would seem to refer to the five kingdoms that had preceded John’s day: Egypt, Assyria, Babylon, Persia, and Greece. The “one is” would seem to be the one existing when John was writing: Rome, in its “first phase.” The “other is not yet come” would seem to point to that final world empire that will be taken over by the “11th horn.” The following verse also focuses on this final empire:
And the beast that was, and is not, even he is the eighth, and is of the seven, and goeth into perdition. -Revelation 17:11
It would seem that this final “eighth” empire is one “that was, and is not,” and yet is among the list of seven. The only empire among the seven that doesn’t exist in some form today is Assyria. It strangely disappeared from history until the sensational discoveries of Henry Layard in 1849.
The Return of Nimrod?
The first world dictator was Nimrod (whose name means “we rebel”), who ruled from Babylon.6 It is interesting that Micah also refers to the “land of Nimrod” in his allusion to the final world empire. Could it be that this final world dictator will be, in some sense, a return of Nimrod? Could it be that there will also be some kind of climactic ellipsis of Satan’s kingdoms7 as we approach the final judgment? If so, it is noteworthy that Nimrod ruled from Babylon.
The Mystery of Babylon
This may add an additional dimension to the mysteries surrounding the future of Babylon: Is it just used as a symbol? Or will Babylon literally rise to prominence on the banks of the Euphrates once again?
There are those who regard “Babylon” as simply a rhetorical device, and who interpret the prophetic passages symbolically. There are also those who feel that the “Mystery Babylon” of Revelation refers to the Vatican. 8 However, there are passages in both Isaiah and Jeremiah that clearly describe a destruction of Babylon that has never happened-yet.9 (Many Bible commentaries and helps are in error on this point: one must not confuse the fall of Babylon to the Persians in 539 B.C. with the destruction of Babylon detailed in the Bible. When Cyrus conquered Babylon, he was able to brag to the world that he did it without a battle!)
It is significant to compare the accounts of Babylon’s destiny in Isaiah, Jeremiah, and Revelation. [See Table]. Contrary to the details emphasized in the prophecies of Isaiah and Jeremiah, the building materials of ancient Babylon have been reused; the area has been inhabited over the centuries, contrary to the prophetic passages. We feel that it is quite significant that Saddam Hussein has made significant efforts to rebuild Babylon and has used the rebuilt Nebuchadnezzar’s palace for state occasions. It appears that the cataclysmic destruction described by Isaiah and Jeremiah (”like Sodom and Gomorrah”) is still in the future.
A strange vision in the Book of Zechariah may hold the key.
Then the angel that talked with me went forth, and said unto me, Lift up now thine eyes, and see what is this that goeth forth. And I said, What is it? And he said, This is an ephah that goeth forth. He said moreover, This is their resemblance through all the earth. And, behold, there was lifted up a talent of lead: and this is a woman that sitteth in the midst of the ephah. And he said, This is wickedness. And he cast it into the midst of the ephah; and he cast the weight of lead upon the mouth thereof. - Zechariah 5:5-8
An ephah was a familiar volumetric measure in commercial practice, about a bushel in capacity. The talent of lead was a commercial standard of weight, about 96 Avoirdupois (U.S.) pounds. The woman that was sealed into this container was labeled “wickedness.”
Then lifted I up mine eyes, and looked, and, behold, there came out two women, and the wind was in their wings; for they had wings like the wings of a stork: and they lifted up the ephah between the earth and the heaven. Then said I to the angel that talked with me, Whither do these bear the ephah? And he said unto me, To build it an house in the land of Shinar: and it shall be established, and set there upon her own base. - Zechariah 5:10-11
It should be borne in mind that the stork was, in Jewish terms, an unclean bird.10 This vision has “sinister” written all over it! Shinar is the geographic location where Babylon was located. It seems that this woman - wickedness, mother of harlots, etc. - is to be relocated to where it all began.
All idolatry and paganism had its roots at Bab-El, which became Babylon. The pagan priesthood and its attendant rites then followed the political power structures of each succeeding empire until it ultimately settled in Rome. Thus, the various false gods they worshiped followed in various forms: Ishtar and Tammuz of Babylon became Isis and Osiris in Egypt, Aphrodite and Zeus in Greece, Venus and Jupiter in Rome, and Ashtoreth and Baal in Chaldea. Zechariah’s vision seems to indicate that this pagan centroid of power will migrate back to where it all started to receive its final judgment.
Further Mysteries
There are those who also suspect that the final world leader will be an apparent “reincarnation” of a prominent leader of the past. Nero was a common suggestion. Others even believe it could be Judas reincarnated.11 (”Reincarnation” has been a traditional lie of Satan, echoing his lie at Eden: “Ye shall not surely die.”12
Reincarnation is clearly refuted in Scripture,13 although Satan may stage a counterfeit.) But there are other possibilities as well. What about cloning from a protein sample of the past? Is it possible that this “eighth” is “of the seven” in microbiological sense? Also, remember the strange hint that Jesus gave us:
But as the days of Noah were, so shall also the coming of the Son of man be. -Matthew 24:37; Luke 17:26
In order to appreciate this allusion, it is essential to understand what the “days of Noah” were like, including the strange mischief caused by the fallen angels. It has been suggested that this coming leader may be a Nephilim, a recurrence of events in Genesis 6 that brought the previous cataclysmic judgment of the flood upon the earth.
Conclusion
With the current world turmoil surrounding Iraq and the Middle East, it is likely that the coming months and years will bring some striking changes. It is essential that we stand back from our presumptions and prejudices and listen carefully to what the Biblical text is telling us. We are living in exciting times, but we need to be diligent in our study of God’s Word. The only certain barrier to truth is the presumption that we already have it.
Endnotes
Daniel 9:26.
Isaiah 10:5, 24; 14:25; 30:31; Ezekiel 31:3f., Micah 5:5, 6.
Daniel 7:8, 20-26; 8:9-14.
Daniel 11:5-35.
Daniel 8:9-14; 11:36ff.
Genesis 10:8-10.
2 Corinthians 4:4.
Alexander Hislop, The Two Babylons, is the classic work here. However, Dave Hunt’s A Woman Rides the Beast , has emerged as the definitive work here; well researched and documented, it is a “must read” on this topic.
Isaiah 13, 14; Jeremiah 50, 51.
Leviticus 11:19; Deuteronomy 14:18.
Psalm 55:11-14; Isaiah 28:18, Revelation 6:8; Matthew 12:41-43; John 17:12; John 6:7; 2 Thessalonians 2:3; Acts 1:25, with Revelation 11:7. (He emerges out of the Abousso , Rev 11:7.)
Genesis 3:4.
Hebrews 9:27.
January 27th, 2009 at 11:55 pm
Chuck Missler is a real scholar in the word. I remember going to some of his Bible studies in the ’70’s at Calvary Chapel in Costa Mesa. Fascinating and extremely intelligent man. He has changed his tune a bit about where the anti-christ would emerge from. He is not one of those guys that sticks to a preconceived notion, no matter what, but is willing to reexamine the text over and over. I learned so much from his examination and teaching of the Bible.
January 28th, 2009 at 12:06 am
me also chuck missler is awesome !!!!
January 28th, 2009 at 3:29 am
One problem i have with the Assyrian view is that the book of revelation points more toward Turkey.
Revelation, points at Turkey, thus it can not be Assyrian in anyway, shape or form. I think if anything, Assyrian is just a metaphor, like Babylon.
Revelation main location is the Island of Patmos, the seven churches, all in Asia Minor.
Asia Minor has played the central role of the Middle East for almost 2,000 years. As the central location for the Roman Empire (East), the central location of the Church in the East. Byzantine Empire was centered in Asia Minor, as well as the Ottoman Empire (The Beast and False Prophet) and in the future with Gog and Magog.
To deny all that creates a problem.
January 28th, 2009 at 4:38 am
Paul,
I do not think this is a problem.
Compare a map of modern Turkey
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:TurkeyOMC.png
with a map of Assyria:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Map_of_Assyria.png
There is a considerable overlap.
Secondly, in what I’ve read in several places about what the location of Gog and his peoples (from Ezechiel) is, then the regions on the Eastern border of modern Turkey also belong to it. This makes the overlap with Assyria even larger.
January 28th, 2009 at 6:00 am
Thirdly, if Turkey ever would conquer Kurdistan in North Iraq (for its oil wealth for instance, and to pevent an independent Kurdistan) then teh overlap would become huge.
January 28th, 2009 at 12:32 pm
Adament,
The Kurds are the same people as the Medes. GOD will raise them up against the AntiChrist.
January 28th, 2009 at 4:57 pm
Folks,
Walid Shoebat has a (7 part) YouTube video which he presented at Koinonia House for anyone interested:
Here’s part 1 (you should be able to find that other 6 parts once you get there)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H7A-sXsS1mk&feature=related
January 28th, 2009 at 10:49 pm
Adamant it is interesting that you would say this: if Turkey ever would conquer Kurdistan in North Iraq.
I believe this is a possibility. If you click my name, it will take you to my blog, where i wrote out possible scenarios of what might happen if America withdraws from Iraq and we pacify Afghanistan.
One of the possibilities is that Turkey and Iran with Syria will ally together and invade Iraq and in essence remove it as a nation. All three of them have been threatened by Iraq, and I think it is in there mindset to make sure Iraq is never a threat again, that being done by Iraq being occupied and assimilated into Iran, Syria and Turkey.
January 29th, 2009 at 4:55 am
Gideon,
You are correct, but Northern Iraq / Kurdstan does not only contain Medes. It is also home to the ethnic Assyrians, as is Anatolia (South-Eastern Turkey) and the regions East of Turkey.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assyrian_and_Neo-Aramaic_people
January 29th, 2009 at 5:07 am
Paul Evans,
I just read your three scenarios and all of them seem very reasonable and probable to me. Most of them enlarge the number of Assyrians in Greater-Turkey considerable.
The first president Bush left Saddam in power after the Gulf War to maintain the local power balance. Exactly because Turkey might have invaded Kurdistan otherwise. At least, that reasoning was in the newspapers at the time.
January 29th, 2009 at 5:50 am
yes Jesus said that satan has his throne there , but remember islam wasnt around then Turkey had the biggest Zesus statue in the world there (altar)
and we must be wise in this matter in the bible it also says Gods throne is in elam ( now we know that this doesnt really mean in elam ) jeremiah 39:48 so we need to research abit more on the matter i think .
remember Jesus was from bethleham , and he was from nazerath ,and he did come from egypt and these scriptures are all scattered about , so also is the antichrist scriptures he is an assyrian , he is the king of tyre , he is a pharoah , he is the king of the north ? , he is the willful king , the prince who is to come ,many things in hind site we will be able to go awe yes he is all of these as we can do about jesus now but then in the days of the messiah we couldnt of since there were many different prophecies about he as well that only looking back they add up .
rasul .
January 29th, 2009 at 7:07 pm
Yes! Yes! Why have we accepted this “Mystery Babylon” as Rome or the Vatican? That is so putting your own spin on the Holy Word of God! When the Bible speaks in allegory or metaphor it says so, and then defines it! I’m so blessed by this post. I shared with a couple people, Close Friends, that I was not nor have I ever been convinced of a Western European Revived Roman Empire Scenario and they looked at me like I had committed Blasphemy! Until the Scripture says so…(on Western Rome) you gotta do a lot of adding and hypothesizing to make it fit! And every good Bible Scholar teaches not to do this…don’t add or subtract from the bible. I believe the closer we get the more clear it will all be. But until then, thank you Joel and your compatriots who are shedding light on this subject! If we all pull our knowledge and gifts together we can discern together like the Bereans did. And thanks for the Shoebat youtube link, I’m going right now to check it out!
January 30th, 2009 at 11:35 pm
Andrea…read Alexander Hislop’s book The Two Babylons. In it he tells how Nimrod’s Babylonian mystery religion was taken to Rome by Simon Peter the Sorcerer who established the counterfeit pagan religion in Rome masked as Chrisitanity. Hislop also tells about one of the Pope’s thrones being cleaned at one time and they discovered it was carved with figures of Hercules. It is an interesting book and sheds much light on church origins, traditions and so on. And of course the TWO in the title is meant to be symbolic of the ancient Babylon with Nimrod’s religion and the false religions that have developed from it.
Just thought you’d like to know…
February 1st, 2009 at 3:31 pm
Patty,
Hislop’s book is one of the most horrific examples or poor scholarhsip that is out there. Please read Baptist Pastor Ralph Woodrow’s book Babylon Connection? It dispells many of the historical, logical and factual errors of Hislop’s book. You can find it in my EStore.
Bless You, Joel
February 1st, 2009 at 5:30 pm
Thank you, Joel. Better late than never! I couldn’t get back on last night so thought I’d check today. I will check out Babylon Connection.
And, Bless You…
February 1st, 2009 at 7:32 pm
great let me know what you think Patty